Posts tagged Media
Posts tagged Media
Iran is poised to greatly expand uranium enrichment at a fortified underground bunker to a point that would boost how quickly it could make nuclear warheads, diplomats tell The Associated Press.
They said Tehran has put finishing touches for the installation of thousands of new-generation centrifuges at the cavernous facility — machines that can produce enriched uranium much more quickly and efficiently than its present machines…
Still, the senior diplomats — who asked for anonymity because their information was privileged — suggested that Tehran would have little reason to prepare the ground for the better centrifuges unless it planned to operate them. They spoke in recent interviews — the last one Saturday.
The reported work at Fordo appeared to reflect Iran’s determination to forge ahead with nuclear activity that could be used to make atomic arms despite rapidly escalating international sanctions and the latent threat of an Israeli military strike on its nuclear facilities.
Fordo could be used to make fissile warhead material even without such an upgrade, the diplomats said.
They said that although older than Iran’s new generation machines, the centrifuges now operating there can be reconfigured within days to make such material because they already are enriching to 20 percent — a level that can be boosted quickly to weapons-grade quality.
You’ve got to love “Anonymous Government Official”- they’re always willing to provide a lie just obscure enough that it doesn’t bother to get fact checked. Let’s take a look at the actual information here.
Iran has Uranium enrichment capabilities that allow up to 20%- the diplomats claim that this is able to be used for weapons at the moment, and that it won’t be tough to get the enrichment process to weapons-grade level. The only problem? Weapons grade Uranium is 85% Uranium- although you can weaponize 20% Uranium, you could simply use other explosives to produce the same power for significantly less investment.
You know what 20% enriched Uranium is good for? Light water reactors to provide cheap energy.
It’s cool, though, I’m sure those anonymous officials have only truth and public interest at heart, no need for reporters to actually fact check their statements- much better to uncritically publish them and allow them to hide behind a veil of secrecy- too bad anonymous sources from outside the government don’t get the same treatment.
It’s not just conservative media. Supposedly “liberal” media like MSBNC and NYT have been fear-mongering as well, though perhaps with slightly less fervor.
Just a note- I agree with this assessment completely, and consider the NYT and MSNBC conservative media institutions. The New York Times uncovered Bush’s warrantless wiretapping program and refused to report on it until 2005, after the election (they waited over a year to report it). MSNBC canceled their most popular show in 2003 because Phil Donahue, the host, was against the war.
These institutions are conservative in nature, and run by wealthy conservatives. They will distort the truth and mislead the public, if it means an increase in profit (or a shift in policy that would lead to an increase in profit).
Diane Sawyer of ABC News created and aired a ‘report’ filled with fabrications, uncritically repeated government accusations, and outright lies.
Sawyer begins by warning of “a kind of shadow war being waged by Iran around the world” — based on her blind acceptance of totally unproven Israeli accusations that Iran was behind three bombings yesterday in India, Georgia and Thailand, and without any mention of the constant attacks on Iran over the course of several years by the U.S. and Israel. After seeing video of ABC‘s Martha Raddatz riding on U.S. naval warships into the Strait of Hormuz, we are told by Sawyer — echoing the warnings just yesterday from Alan Dershowitz, Ethan Bronner, and some NYPD official — that “Israeli and Jewish facilities, including those here in the U.S., are on heightened alert,” and then Brian Ross is brought in to warn that “the violence could spill over into the U.S.” as “Jewish places of worship in at least ten U.S. cities have been told that they could be targets.” This, you see, “follows what appears to be the increasingly violent series of attacks by Iran.”
The State Department spokesperson is then brought in “to tie the incidents to Iran”; we hear her warn that “we are concerned about use of international terrorism by Iran or anyone else against Israel or any innocents.” Richard Clarke is then hauled out to say that Iran is sending a signal to Israel that it can retaliate using “its terrorist network.” Needless to say, no contrary information or critical sources are included: no Iranians are heard from and there’s nobody to question any of these accusations. It’s just one-sided, unchallenged government claims masquerading as a news report.
Note that this entire story is based on pure fabrication — not just by accepting as Truth the Israeli and American accusation that Iran is behind these attacks, but far worse, continuously warning about Iranian attacks on synagogues and other targets inside the U.S. There is literally zero evidence that any of that is happening. The text on the website of ABC News displaying the Sawyer/Ross story expressly says: “Federal officials told ABC News that there is so far no specific intelligence of any threat to Israeli interests in the U.S.” (that didn’t make it into the TV broadcast). Yet here we have multiple media outlets — including ABC – issuing incredibly inflammatory “warnings” that Iran may launch Terrorist attacks on Jewish houses of worships and other targets on U.S. soil, all based on pure speculation and fabrication. To call that reckless is to understate the case: given Sawyer’s continuous 2002-like fear-mongering, it seems much more concerted than mere recklessness.
Did we learn nothing from Iraq? Now, we have to sit and let the conservative media tell lie after lie again in order to start another war. Absolutely despicable.
This video aired on Saturday Night Live on NBC in March of 1998- then it was cut from all subsequent broadcasts of that episode because it “wasn’t funny”. Well, I’m certainly not laughing, that’s for sure.
Fox was forced to acknowledge the 8.6% unemployment rate, but they still managed to do a little ‘fancy accounting’ in the graphic. Notice how 8.6% is the same height as 9%, and 8.8% is actually less than November’s 8.6%.
Fox News Headlines Vs. The Actual News Headlines - II
Fox News cited each of these “actual news headlines” as their “source.”
Fair and balanced. Yup.
[I]t must have been disturbing to Ailes when the wheels started to come off Fox’s presidential-circus caravan. (Coincidentally or not, this happened more or less when Donald Trump jumped on: “They like me on the network,” Trump told me. “I get ratings.”) The problem wasn’t that ratings had been slipping that much—Beck’s show declined by 30 percent from record highs, but the ratings were still nearly double those from before he joined the network. It was that, with an actual presidential election on the horizon, the Fox candidates’ poll numbers remain dismally low (Sarah Palin is polling 12 percent; Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum, 10 percent and 2 percent, respectively). Ailes’s candidates-in-waiting were coming up small. And, for all his programming genius, he was more interested in a real narrative than a television narrative—he wanted to elect a president. All he had to do was watch Fox’s May 5 debate in South Carolina to see what a mess the field was—a mess partly created by the loudmouths he’d given airtime to and a tea party he’d nurtured. And, not incidentally, a strong Republican candidate would be good for his business, too…
[F]rom the moment of Obama’s inauguration, Fox went on the offensive. Its pundits pushed stories including tales of voter intimidation by the New Black Panther Party, ACORN fraud, Obama’s czars, and Obama’s rumored $200 million–per–day trip to India. As the summer of 2009 unfolded, with tea-party anger over the stimulus and health care ratcheting up, Fox and the White House went to war. In June 2009, Obama gave an interview to CNBC’s John Harwood and lashed out. “I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration,” he said. “That’s a pretty big megaphone. You’d be hard-pressed, if you watched the entire day, to find a positive story about me on that front.”
But it wasn’t until a month later that a succession of media controversies convinced the White House that Fox was a dangerous opponent that needed to be taken on. On July 28, Beck went on Fox and Friends,called Obama a “racist,” and declared that his response to the dustup between Henry Louis Gates Jr. and the Cambridge Police Department exposed the president’s “deep-seated hatred for white people.” Beck’s next target was Obama’s green-jobs “czar,” Van Jones, who had been blasted for signing a 9/11 “Truth Statement” in 2004. Jones resigned on September 6. Four days later, Fox broke the undercover video of conservative prankster James O’Keefe’s ACORN sting. “I had never heard of Glenn Beck before,” Dunn told me. “Obviously, August of 2009 was a disaster.”
This whole article (written by Gabriel Sherman) is a fantastic read. It gives great insight into what was going on behind the scenes at Fox during their most… imaginative moments.