Tumble DC 25

Marginally better than silence

  1. thewetmale reblogged this from puffy-lipped-gay-bar-pinup and added:
    I was going to make a comment about the difference between a bail hearing and an actual trial but looking at the threads...
  2. jjarichardson reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham
  3. 77825225672443 reblogged this from atonaldissonance and added:
    Because, honestly, a lot of the people who are complaining about what MM did…have absolutely no idea how the law fucking...
  4. puffy-lipped-gay-bar-pinup reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    people can get rid of evidence, especially in a rape case and ESPECIALLY if the accused is someone who’s done something...
  5. thelyoness reblogged this from gadgetry and added:
    “If you object to Moore bailing Assange out, you object to someone spending money to end the torture of someone…” ^ Good...
  6. torayot reblogged this from fillingthespaces and added:
    Commentary. Yes.
  7. fillingthespaces reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    The problem being that under a system requiring “proof beyond a reasonable doubt”, perpetrators are often unconvictable...
  8. jjarichardson reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    There is absolutely no evidence for the sex crimes Assange is being prosecuted for. They are a manufactured smear...
  9. rosietint reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    What evidence can there be? I’m not asking this rhetorically. I actually asking you, what evidence can there be in a...
  10. pixyled reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    This is another problem with rape being convicted. A great number of rape kits are not even tested in many places (in...
  11. bowiecadmium reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    Do you think we should dismiss an accusation of rape simply because there is a single accuser? A single witness? Because...
  12. jonathan-cunningham reblogged this from bowiecadmium and added:
    I understand that now, and I apologize for whatever implications that I’ve made. I’ll drop the subject.
  13. jonathan-cunningham reblogged this from rosietint and added:
    …no, that’s not what I said at all. The police, not you, are responsible for collecting evidence. In order to convict...
  14. bowiecadmium reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    [1] New evidence: “The woman’s lawyer appealed against the decision. Director of public prosecution Marianne Ny decided...
  15. rosietint reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    That isn’t a solution. That is reality. But, as I said, I’m glad to know that if I’m raped I better collect ALL THE...
  16. skeletonfun reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    Right, but you’re ignoring centuries of a patriarchal judiciary system. Women’s rights have only become an issue within...
  17. jonathan-cunningham reblogged this from rosietint and added:
    That solution is unacceptable, but still far superior to convicting people of rape based on a single accusation.
  18. jonathan-cunningham reblogged this from bowiecadmium and added:
    So you think convictions should be based on a single accusation? There are two instances in question (enough to...
  19. rosietint reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    So what then, we should just accept that rape is difficult crime to prove and move on? And we just accept that rapists...
  20. jonathan-cunningham reblogged this from rosietint and added:
    If I understand your first statement, you believe that because evidence other than eye witness testimony is used to...
  21. cantgetrite reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    I can’t believe it was really just said that an accusation should be enough to convict someone of a crime. Thats...
  22. jonathan-cunningham reblogged this from bowiecadmium and added:
    [1] There have been no new charges. If you have evidence otherwise, I welcome it. The investigation was reopened, true,...
  23. bowiecadmium reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    That’s really fucking condescending. First you dismiss this person’s statement by calling them “emotional” and then...
  24. rosietint reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    Um, people are convicted of various offenses all the fucking time with zero eye witnesses, let alone one. Can you name...
  25. jonathan-cunningham reblogged this from rosietint and added:
    It’s obvious how emotionally attached to this issue you are, but can you name any other offense in which it would be...
  26. emiryb reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    genuine curiosity: what should be enough evidence to convict someone...rape, then? In too...
  27. rosietint reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    And there you have it. EVEN IF HE DID ACTUALLY RAPE THEM, the women saying in a court of law that they were raped are...
  28. bowiecadmium reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    While I think I get the point that you are making about Assange and the issue over his imprisonment and bail, I would...
  29. gadgetry reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    It’s a difficult issue to navigate, but as I said, the courts have a very poor track record of dealing with rape...